The State of Maharashtra vs Barkatali Abdul Kalam Chaudhari and 2 Advocate - Gunjal M.M. — 108/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,397,400,504,506. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
MCOCO1999 - Special Case under MCOCO ACT 1999
CNR: MHRG170010232020
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
597/2020
Filing Date
23-09-2020
Registration No
108/2020
Registration Date
16-10-2020
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
Taloja Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Barkatali Abdul Kalam Chaudhari and 2 Advocate - Gunjal M.M.
Jiyauddin Acchan Khan
Kalam Shamshudin Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 04-04-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 01-04-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 24-03-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 16-03-2026 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED; charges will proceed under MCOC Act and IPC. The Sessions Judge rejected accused Kalam Shamsuddin Khan's petition for discharge under Section 227 CrPC, finding prima facie evidence of involvement in organized crime. The court determined sufficient grounds exist to proceed with charges related to robbery (CR No. 205/2017 Taloja), including multiple prior charge-sheets within 10 years establishing the "continuing unlawful activity" required under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED; charges will proceed under MCOC Act and IPC. The Sessions Judge rejected accused Kalam Shamsuddin Khan's petition for discharge under Section 227 CrPC, finding prima facie evidence of involvement in organized crime. The court determined sufficient grounds exist to proceed with charges related to robbery (CR No. 205/2017 Taloja), including multiple prior charge-sheets within 10 years establishing the "continuing unlawful activity" required under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts