State of Maharashtra Through Panvel Railway Police Station vs Babalu Chokharam Chavariya — 113/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64(2)(th),65(1). Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170009032025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
640/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
113/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Panvel Railway Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Panvel Railway Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Babalu Chokharam Chavariya
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 14-05-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 30-04-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 16-04-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 10-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bablu Chokharam Chavariya (113/2025) Outcome: The court allowed the prosecution's application and granted permission for Panvel Railway Police Station to collect blood samples from the accused for DNA examination. The accused was directed to cooperate with the procedure. The court found the serious nature of offences (BNS §137(2), 64(2), 65(1) and POCSO Act §4 & 8) justified DNA profiling to compare with semen stains found on the victim's clothes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bablu Chokharam Chavariya (113/2025) Outcome: The court allowed the prosecution's application and granted permission for Panvel Railway Police Station to collect blood samples from the accused for DNA examination. The accused was directed to cooperate with the procedure. The court found the serious nature of offences (BNS §137(2), 64(2), 65(1) and POCSO Act §4 & 8) justified DNA profiling to compare with semen stains found on the victim's clothes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts