State of Maharashtra Through Panvel City Police Station vs Dipak Mohan Phad And — 66/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5),318(4),335,336(1)(2),337,338,339,341,178,179,183,45(C),59,60,328,239,3(5),3(6),3(7),3(8). Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG170008812025
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
630/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
Panvel CityTown Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Panvel City Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Dipak Mohan Phad And
Sanket Laxman Patil
Vishal Anant Mundkar
Pravin Dharyadhar Bandivadekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 04-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 02-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 30-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 20-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge Panvel rejected accused Deepak Mohan Phad's application for interim/temporary medical bail on 31/01/2026. Although Phad claimed severe medical conditions requiring specialized surgical treatment, the court found insufficient grounds for bail based on the Chief Medical Officer's report. The court directed jail authorities to provide appropriate medical care and hospital referrals as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge Panvel rejected accused Deepak Mohan Phad's application for interim/temporary medical bail on 31/01/2026. Although Phad claimed severe medical conditions requiring specialized surgical treatment, the court found insufficient grounds for bail based on the Chief Medical Officer's report. The court directed jail authorities to provide appropriate medical care and hospital referrals as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts