State of Maharashtra Through Panvel City Police Station vs Abdul Majid Mo.Ibrahim Khan Deshmukh — 85/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),75,351(3). Status: Evidence Before Charge. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170006452025
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
485/2025
Filing Date
03-04-2025
Registration No
85/2025
Registration Date
03-04-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
Panvel CityTown Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Panvel City Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Abdul Majid Mo.Ibrahim Khan Deshmukh
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Evidence Before Charge
Charge
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Before Charge | |
| 23-02-2026 | Charge | |
| 07-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 24-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 14-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Special Judge at Panvel rejected both applications (exh.31 & 32) filed by accused Abdul Majid Khan Deshmukh seeking production of admission documents from Manav Seva Sangh and personal documents (marriage, divorce, death certificate) from the informant. The court held that since charges have not yet been framed and the matter is in the pre-evidence stage, the accused cannot seek such documents at this juncture; he may request witness summoning only after the prosecution presents its evidence. The applications have been disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Judge at Panvel rejected both applications (exh.31 & 32) filed by accused Abdul Majid Khan Deshmukh seeking production of admission documents from Manav Seva Sangh and personal documents (marriage, divorce, death certificate) from the informant. The court held that since charges have not yet been framed and the matter is in the pre-evidence stage, the accused cannot seek such documents at this juncture; he may request witness summoning only after the prosecution presents its evidence. The applications have been disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts