State of Maharashtra vs Dr.Pankaj Gopalrao Patil and ors. — 52/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 370,34,. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG170005982022
Next Hearing
16th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
396/2022
Filing Date
28-03-2022
Registration No
52/2022
Registration Date
28-03-2022
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
437
Police Station
Kamote Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Dr.Pankaj Gopalrao Patil and ors.
Ruksar Nadim Shaikh
Rajani Panduran Jadhav
Amrin Bano Badarbakhash Ali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 10-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 31-01-2026 | Charge | |
| 13-01-2026 | Charge | |
| 02-12-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: Dr. Pankaj Patil's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected and dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad on 07/07/2022. The accused was arrested in connection with an alleged child trafficking and fake currency case (IPC §320, r.w.34; Juvenile Justice Act §81, 87). The court found his medical grounds claims unsubstantiated—lacking proper hospital records—and noted that a co-accused with identical charges had been released on bail, yet rejected similar applications twice before as grounds about lack of evidence and FIR delay had already been dismissed by the predecessor judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Dr. Pankaj Patil's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected and dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad on 07/07/2022. The accused was arrested in connection with an alleged child trafficking and fake currency case (IPC §320, r.w.34; Juvenile Justice Act §81, 87). The court found his medical grounds claims unsubstantiated—lacking proper hospital records—and noted that a co-accused with identical charges had been released on bail, yet rejected similar applications twice before as grounds about lack of evidence and FIR delay had already been dismissed by the predecessor judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts