State of Maharashtra Thorugh Kharghar Police Station vs Tejas Michael Jadhav — 62/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170005382025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
390/2025
Filing Date
13-03-2025
Registration No
62/2025
Registration Date
13-03-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Kharghar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Thorugh Kharghar Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Tejas Michael Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 11-05-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 26-02-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 12-02-2026 | Filing of Surety |
Interim Orders
Case 62/2025 Summary: Accused Tejas Machel Jadhav was granted bail on January 31, 2026, in a kidnapping and sexual assault case involving a 17-year-old victim. The court ordered his release on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bonds, finding that bail is the rule and detention cannot be indefinite punishment. The order imposed strict conditions: no contact with the victim, no entry to victim's residence area, regular trial attendance, passport restrictions, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 62/2025 Summary: Accused Tejas Machel Jadhav was granted bail on January 31, 2026, in a kidnapping and sexual assault case involving a 17-year-old victim. The court ordered his release on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bonds, finding that bail is the rule and detention cannot be indefinite punishment. The order imposed strict conditions: no contact with the victim, no entry to victim's residence area, regular trial attendance, passport restrictions, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts