Yogesh Kakaji Desai vs State of maharashtra — 216/2026
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170004472026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
341/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
216/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
89
Police Station
Khalapur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Kakaji Desai
Adv. GAWAND SNEHA SURYAKANT
Respondent(s)
State of maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Yogesh Kakaji Desai v. State of Maharashtra (216/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Yogesh Kakaji Desai, an assistant engineer with MSEDCL accused of demanding and accepting a ₹1,50,000 bribe under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7. The court found the investigation practically complete with no further recovery needed, noted that most witnesses are government servants unlikely to face pressure, and determined continued detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 PR bond with conditions including weekly ACB reporting and prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Yogesh Kakaji Desai v. State of Maharashtra (216/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Yogesh Kakaji Desai, an assistant engineer with MSEDCL accused of demanding and accepting a ₹1,50,000 bribe under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7. The court found the investigation practically complete with no further recovery needed, noted that most witnesses are government servants unlikely to face pressure, and determined continued detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted on ₹50,000 PR bond with conditions including weekly ACB reporting and prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts