Mohammad Shafiq Hanif Shah vs the state of maharashtra Through Panvel City Police Station — 215/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170004462026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
340/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
215/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
745
Police Station
Panvel CityTown Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Shafiq Hanif Shah
Adv. BODARE DEVENDRA ASHOK
Adarsh Hari Singh Tailor
Adv. BODARE DEVENDRA ASHOK
Respondent(s)
the state of maharashtra Through Panvel City Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 215/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Mohammad Shafiq Hanif Shah and Adarsh Hari Singh Tailor, who were arrested for theft of gold ornaments worth ₹4,80,000 and related offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found both applicants to be habitual offenders with a 10-year history of unlawful activities and multiple pending cases at various police stations, concluding that their release would endanger public property, hamper investigation, and pose a threat to society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 215/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Mohammad Shafiq Hanif Shah and Adarsh Hari Singh Tailor, who were arrested for theft of gold ornaments worth ₹4,80,000 and related offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found both applicants to be habitual offenders with a 10-year history of unlawful activities and multiple pending cases at various police stations, concluding that their release would endanger public property, hamper investigation, and pose a threat to society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts