Vijay Sunil Bodake vs The State Of Maharashtra — 206/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170004182026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
324/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
206/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
Karjat Police StationTal.Karjat
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijay Sunil Bodake
Adv. Mandar Madhukar Gurav
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to Vijay Sunil Bodake, who was arrested for making derogatory statements against the Indian Constitution and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar on Instagram, charged under BNS Section 299 and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act Sections 3(1)(u) and 3(1)(v). The court found that further detention was unjustified as no recovery was required and the applicant had been in custody since March 2, 2026, imposing stringent conditions including Rs. 60,000 bail bond, weekly police reporting, prohibition from leaving India, and a ban on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to Vijay Sunil Bodake, who was arrested for making derogatory statements against the Indian Constitution and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar on Instagram, charged under BNS Section 299 and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act Sections 3(1)(u) and 3(1)(v). The court found that further detention was unjustified as no recovery was required and the applicant had been in custody since March 2, 2026, imposing stringent conditions including Rs. 60,000 bail bond, weekly police reporting, prohibition from leaving India, and a ban on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts