Santosh Ramkrishna Kattimani vs State of Maharashtra — 200/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318,316,351,352. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170004072026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

316/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

200/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

481

Police Station

Kharghar Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318,316,351,352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Ramkrishna Kattimani

    Adv. MISHRA RAHUL JANARDAN

  2. 2.Dhananjay Dharamdev Prajapati

    Adv. MISHRA RAHUL JANARDAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Santosh Ramkrishna Kattimani and Dhananjay Dharamdev Prajapati in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 318, 316, 351, and 352. The court found that despite the applicants' claim of changed circumstances (producing the vehicle in question), the investigation revealed signature discrepancies on TTO forms that aggravated the crime's nature, necessitating custodial interrogation. The application was rejected with a cost of Rs. 10,000 imposed for frivolous re-litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Santosh Ramkrishna Kattimani and Dhananjay Dharamdev Prajapati in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 318, 316, 351, and 352. The court found that despite the applicants' claim of changed circumstances (producing the vehicle in question), the investigation revealed signature discrepancies on TTO forms that aggravated the crime's nature, necessitating custodial interrogation. The application was rejected with a cost of Rs. 10,000 imposed for frivolous re-litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case