Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare vs The State of Maharashtra Through Karjat Police Station — 194/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003992026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
309/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
194/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
97
Police Station
Karjat Police StationTal.Karjat
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare
Adv. GHARAT MILKA DIGAMBER
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Through Karjat Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Special Judge at Panvel allowed applicant Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare's bail application and granted his release on cash security of Rs. 15,000 instead of the previously ordered personal and surety bonds, recognizing his difficulty in finding a surety while incarcerated. The court permitted this interim arrangement for two months, after which the applicant must furnish a proper surety, with all other bail conditions from the previous order remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 194/2026
The Special Judge at Panvel allowed applicant Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare's bail application and granted his release on cash security of Rs. 15,000 instead of the previously ordered personal and surety bonds, recognizing his difficulty in finding a surety while incarcerated. The court permitted this interim arrangement for two months, after which the applicant must furnish a proper surety, with all other bail conditions from the previous order remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts