Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare vs The State of Maharashtra Through Karjat Police Station — 194/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170003992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

309/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

194/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

97

Police Station

Karjat Police StationTal.Karjat

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare

Adv. GHARAT MILKA DIGAMBER

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Karjat Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Order

05-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Special Judge at Panvel allowed applicant Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare's bail application and granted his release on cash security of Rs. 15,000 instead of the previously ordered personal and surety bonds, recognizing his difficulty in finding a surety while incarcerated. The court permitted this interim arrangement for two months, after which the applicant must furnish a proper surety, with all other bail conditions from the previous order remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge at Panvel allowed applicant Rohidas Kaluram Waghmare's bail application and granted his release on cash security of Rs. 15,000 instead of the previously ordered personal and surety bonds, recognizing his difficulty in finding a surety while incarcerated. The court permitted this interim arrangement for two months, after which the applicant must furnish a proper surety, with all other bail conditions from the previous order remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case