Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal vs The State of Maharashtra — 184/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003832026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
293/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Neral Police station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal
Adv. Ankit Bangera
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 04-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal in a property fraud case involving forged documents and signatures. The judge found that the applicant's role was limited to acting as a witness, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and no recovery was required, warranting bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 60,000 bond, weekly police station reporting, and a restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal in a property fraud case involving forged documents and signatures. The judge found that the applicant's role was limited to acting as a witness, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and no recovery was required, warranting bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 60,000 bond, weekly police station reporting, and a restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts