Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal vs The State of Maharashtra — 184/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170003832026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

293/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

109

Police Station

Neral Police station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,467,468,471AND34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal

    Adv. Ankit Bangera

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal in a property fraud case involving forged documents and signatures. The judge found that the applicant's role was limited to acting as a witness, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and no recovery was required, warranting bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 60,000 bond, weekly police station reporting, and a restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Arvind Bholenath Jaiswal in a property fraud case involving forged documents and signatures. The judge found that the applicant's role was limited to acting as a witness, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and no recovery was required, warranting bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 60,000 bond, weekly police station reporting, and a restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case