Harsh Vikas Kumar Gupta vs The State of Maharashtra — 179/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003742026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
285/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
179/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
83
Police Station
Taloja Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Harsh Vikas Kumar Gupta
Adv. Patel Tanveer Aziz
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Special Judge at Panvel granted bail to Harsh Vikas Kumar Gupta, accused of sexual assault and threats against his former girlfriend, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention would amount to punishment without trial and that the investigation was substantially complete. The court imposed strict conditions including a ₹30,000 bail bond, restrictions on contacting the victim, and a prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2026
The Special Judge at Panvel granted bail to Harsh Vikas Kumar Gupta, accused of sexual assault and threats against his former girlfriend, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention would amount to punishment without trial and that the investigation was substantially complete. The court imposed strict conditions including a ₹30,000 bail bond, restrictions on contacting the victim, and a prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts