Jagdish Nathubhai Patel vs The State of Maharashtra Through Rasayani Police Station Advocate - Government pleader — 178/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003732026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
284/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
178/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
Rasayani Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagdish Nathubhai Patel
Adv. SALUNKE HEMANT MACHINDRA
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Rasayani Police Station Advocate - Government pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 02-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Jagdish Nathubhai Patel under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The court found that the applicant, as a sub-contractor, prepared forged documents and misappropriated 146.135 metric tons of scrap material valued at Rs. 88,43,400 in furtherance of common intention with co-accused, which constitutes serious offenses under Sections 420, 409, and 467 IPC punishable with life imprisonment; hence, custodial interrogation was deemed necessary and the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Jagdish Nathubhai Patel under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The court found that the applicant, as a sub-contractor, prepared forged documents and misappropriated 146.135 metric tons of scrap material valued at Rs. 88,43,400 in furtherance of common intention with co-accused, which constitutes serious offenses under Sections 420, 409, and 467 IPC punishable with life imprisonment; hence, custodial interrogation was deemed necessary and the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts