Sanjeev Gangaram Saxsena vs The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - Government pleader — 176/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170003702026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

282/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

176/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

Kharghar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

Sanjeev Gangaram Saxsena

Adv. BHOSALE INDRAJEET ANANDRAO

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - Government pleader

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

09-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel granted regular bail to applicant Sanjeev Gangaram Saxsena in Crime No. 34/2026 under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that major investigation was complete and the vehicle recovered, making further custody unnecessary, and imposed strict conditions including Rs. 60,000 bail with weekly reporting to Crime Branch, non-association with witnesses, and cancellation of bail if similar crimes are committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel granted regular bail to applicant Sanjeev Gangaram Saxsena in Crime No. 34/2026 under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that major investigation was complete and the vehicle recovered, making further custody unnecessary, and imposed strict conditions including Rs. 60,000 bail with weekly reporting to Crime Branch, non-association with witnesses, and cancellation of bail if similar crimes are committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case