Vipinkumar Roshanlal Shisodiya vs State Of Maharashtra — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003562026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
273/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
168
Police Station
Khandeshwar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vipinkumar Roshanlal Shisodiya
Adv. SHUBHAM UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to applicant Vipinkumar Roshanlal Shisodiya in a case involving online financial fraud where Rs. 24,90,000 was fraudulently obtained from the victim through WhatsApp impersonation. The court allowed the bail application despite the serious nature of the offence (punishable up to 7 years imprisonment) because the investigation regarding the applicant was completed and prolonged detention would not serve justice. The applicant was released on a bond of Rs. 60,000 with stringent conditions including non-departure from India and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to applicant Vipinkumar Roshanlal Shisodiya in a case involving online financial fraud where Rs. 24,90,000 was fraudulently obtained from the victim through WhatsApp impersonation. The court allowed the bail application despite the serious nature of the offence (punishable up to 7 years imprisonment) because the investigation regarding the applicant was completed and prolonged detention would not serve justice. The applicant was released on a bond of Rs. 60,000 with stringent conditions including non-departure from India and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts