Shakib Mustafa Palte vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Neral PSO — 164/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003422026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
259/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
164/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
Neral Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakib Mustafa Palte
Adv. Sahil Shuddhodhana Morey
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through Neral PSO
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to Shakib Mustafa Palte, who was accused of making derogatory statements against the Hindu community during a TV interview regarding the "Sukoon Residency" project. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 60,000 bond, weekly police attendance, prohibition on leaving India without permission, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to Shakib Mustafa Palte, who was accused of making derogatory statements against the Hindu community during a TV interview regarding the "Sukoon Residency" project. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 60,000 bond, weekly police attendance, prohibition on leaving India without permission, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts