Rahul Chetan Mehta vs Intelligence Officer, Central Intelligence Unit — 153/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170003142026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

240/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

153/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Rahul Chetan Mehta

Adv. PURSANI SACHI RAJU

Respondent(s)

Intelligence Officer, Central Intelligence Unit

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Order

06-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to Rahul Chetan Mehta in a customs fraud case involving alleged mis-declaration of walnuts' country of origin to wrongfully claim SAFTA duty exemptions resulting in ~₹11.17 crore revenue loss. The court found that as a shipping line manager, Mehta neither controlled customs declarations nor derived direct benefit from duty exemptions, and bills of lading are transport documents that don't determine origin eligibility under SAFTA, making custodial interrogation unnecessary given his fixed local residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to Rahul Chetan Mehta in a customs fraud case involving alleged mis-declaration of walnuts' country of origin to wrongfully claim SAFTA duty exemptions resulting in ~₹11.17 crore revenue loss. The court found that as a shipping line manager, Mehta neither controlled customs declarations nor derived direct benefit from duty exemptions, and bills of lading are transport documents that don't determine origin eligibility under SAFTA, making custodial interrogation unnecessary given his fixed local residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case