Mansur Ibrahim Patel vs The State Of Maharashtra — 138/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170002872026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
216/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
138/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
274
Police Station
Taloja Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mansur Ibrahim Patel
Adv. Mandar Madhukar Gurav
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to Mansur Ibrahim Patel in a criminal case involving alleged conspiracy and assault with deadly weapons. The court found that while the applicant was charged under serious sections of the BNS and Maharashtra Police Act 1951, his name was not mentioned in the original FIR and he was not present at the incident spot; his involvement was based solely on a witness statement alleging he abused the victim prior to the assault. The judge imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 60,000 bond, restriction from contacting witnesses, weekly police reporting, and prohibition from entering areas where the informant and injured parties reside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to Mansur Ibrahim Patel in a criminal case involving alleged conspiracy and assault with deadly weapons. The court found that while the applicant was charged under serious sections of the BNS and Maharashtra Police Act 1951, his name was not mentioned in the original FIR and he was not present at the incident spot; his involvement was based solely on a witness statement alleging he abused the victim prior to the assault. The judge imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 60,000 bond, restriction from contacting witnesses, weekly police reporting, and prohibition from entering areas where the informant and injured parties reside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts