State of Maharashtra vs Metesh Shekhar Shetty — 19/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,120(b),465,468,471,413,201. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG170002762024
Filing Number
205/2024
Filing Date
07-Feb-2024
Registration No
19/2024
Registration Date
07-Feb-2024
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
309
Police Station
NRI Sagari Police Station Navi Mumbai
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Metesh Shekhar Shetty
-
2.Yogesh Shekhar Shetty
-
3.Mahadev Bajarang Merage
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
09-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
05-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
22-Dec-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
15-Nov-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
13-Oct-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
18-Sep-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
18-Aug-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
08-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
17-May-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
11-Apr-2025
Charge
District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
-
13-Mar-2025
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
29-Jan-2025
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
23-Dec-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
21-Oct-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
20-Aug-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
22-Jul-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
13-Jun-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Jun-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY: Bail was granted to accused Mitesh Shekhar Shetty in a theft case involving 350 aluminum plates worth Rs. 5 lakhs from an L&T Construction site. He was released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including monthly police reporting and non-interference with prosecution evidence. The court noted doubts about the applicability of Section 413 IPC and considered that co-accused had already been granted bail by higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
03-Jun-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
24-May-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
18-May-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
15-May-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
08-May-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
18-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Apr-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
16-Apr-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
10-Apr-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
26-Mar-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
22-Mar-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Mar-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Mar-2024
Charge
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
04-Mar-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Mar-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
22-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2024
SUMMARY: Bail was granted to accused Mitesh Shekhar Shetty in a theft case involving 350 aluminum plates worth Rs. 5 lakhs from an L&T Construction site. He was released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including monthly police reporting and non-interference with prosecution evidence. The court noted doubts about the applicability of Section 413 IPC and considered that co-accused had already been granted bail by higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts