Shridhar Bapu Ghadge vs State at the instance of Panvel City Police Station — 124/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170002592026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

193/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

124/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

576

Police Station

Panvel CityTown Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),126(2),140(3),205

Petitioner(s)

Shridhar Bapu Ghadge

Adv. AKASH BALASAHEB DEOKAR

Respondent(s)

State at the instance of Panvel City Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Order

28-02-2026

Order

27-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel granted bail to Shridhar Bapu Ghadge in a crime involving impersonation of police, robbery, and theft of ₹3.03 crores. Although the prosecution argued he was a habitual offender and flight risk, the court found that since ₹2.04 crores were recovered, the investigation was complete with a filed chargesheet, and the applicant had been in custody since October 2025, continued detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted on conditions including a PR bond of ₹1,50,000 with two sureties and a restriction against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel granted bail to Shridhar Bapu Ghadge in a crime involving impersonation of police, robbery, and theft of ₹3.03 crores. Although the prosecution argued he was a habitual offender and flight risk, the court found that since ₹2.04 crores were recovered, the investigation was complete with a filed chargesheet, and the applicant had been in custody since October 2025, continued detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted on conditions including a PR bond of ₹1,50,000 with two sureties and a restriction against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case