Shridhar Bapu Ghadge vs State at the instance of Panvel City Police Station — 124/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170002592026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
193/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
576
Police Station
Panvel CityTown Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shridhar Bapu Ghadge
Adv. AKASH BALASAHEB DEOKAR
Respondent(s)
State at the instance of Panvel City Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order | |
| 28-02-2026 | Order | |
| 27-02-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel granted bail to Shridhar Bapu Ghadge in a crime involving impersonation of police, robbery, and theft of ₹3.03 crores. Although the prosecution argued he was a habitual offender and flight risk, the court found that since ₹2.04 crores were recovered, the investigation was complete with a filed chargesheet, and the applicant had been in custody since October 2025, continued detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted on conditions including a PR bond of ₹1,50,000 with two sureties and a restriction against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel granted bail to Shridhar Bapu Ghadge in a crime involving impersonation of police, robbery, and theft of ₹3.03 crores. Although the prosecution argued he was a habitual offender and flight risk, the court found that since ₹2.04 crores were recovered, the investigation was complete with a filed chargesheet, and the applicant had been in custody since October 2025, continued detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted on conditions including a PR bond of ₹1,50,000 with two sureties and a restriction against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts