Bebi Ravi Josef vs State of Maharashtra — 9/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG170002152026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2026
Filing Number
163/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
Panvel CityTown Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bebi Ravi Josef
Adv. AMOL GAUTAM KHILLARE
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Disposed
Order
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 28-02-2026 | First Order | |
| 07-02-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Swift car (registration MH04/MA-7549) to applicant Bebi Ravi Josef, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderbai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat that vehicles seized in connection with offences should be released expeditiously, and noting that keeping the vehicle in open police station conditions would cause deterioration. The release was conditional upon furnishing a Rs. 10 lakh security bond, prohibiting sale or transfer, and maintaining photographs of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Swift car (registration MH04/MA-7549) to applicant Bebi Ravi Josef, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderbai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat that vehicles seized in connection with offences should be released expeditiously, and noting that keeping the vehicle in open police station conditions would cause deterioration. The release was conditional upon furnishing a Rs. 10 lakh security bond, prohibiting sale or transfer, and maintaining photographs of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts