Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma vs State of maharashtra — 88/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3)337,338. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170001682026
e-Filing Number
23-01-2026
Filing Number
130/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
88/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
544
Police Station
Panvel CityTown Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma
Adv. TONPE SUDHIR SOPAN
Respondent(s)
State of maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
| 20-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma v. State of Maharashtra (88/2026) The Court rejected the applicant's temporary bail application despite his advanced bilateral cataracts and other age-related ailments (diabetes, hypertension), finding that necessary eye surgery and post-operative care could be provided through Sir J.J. Hospital with police escort while he remains in custody. The judge directed the prison superintendent to arrange for the applicant's referral to Sir J.J. Hospital for surgery and ensure post-operative care in jail, treating medical grounds alone as insufficient for temporary bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma v. State of Maharashtra (88/2026) The Court rejected the applicant's temporary bail application despite his advanced bilateral cataracts and other age-related ailments (diabetes, hypertension), finding that necessary eye surgery and post-operative care could be provided through Sir J.J. Hospital with police escort while he remains in custody. The judge directed the prison superintendent to arrange for the applicant's referral to Sir J.J. Hospital for surgery and ensure post-operative care in jail, treating medical grounds alone as insufficient for temporary bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts