Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma vs State of maharashtra — 88/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3)337,338. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170001682026

e-Filing Number

23-01-2026

Filing Number

130/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

544

Police Station

Panvel CityTown Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3)337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma

    Adv. TONPE SUDHIR SOPAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma v. State of Maharashtra (88/2026) The Court rejected the applicant's temporary bail application despite his advanced bilateral cataracts and other age-related ailments (diabetes, hypertension), finding that necessary eye surgery and post-operative care could be provided through Sir J.J. Hospital with police escort while he remains in custody. The judge directed the prison superintendent to arrange for the applicant's referral to Sir J.J. Hospital for surgery and ensure post-operative care in jail, treating medical grounds alone as insufficient for temporary bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  12. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  16. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  17. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  18. 06-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  19. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vinaykumar Shreeramsajeevan Sharma v. State of Maharashtra (88/2026) The Court rejected the applicant's temporary bail application despite his advanced bilateral cataracts and other age-related ailments (diabetes, hypertension), finding that necessary eye surgery and post-operative care could be provided through Sir J.J. Hospital with police escort while he remains in custody. The judge directed the prison superintendent to arrange for the applicant's referral to Sir J.J. Hospital for surgery and ensure post-operative care in jail, treating medical grounds alone as insufficient for temporary bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case