Superintendent Anti Evasion vs Danish Khan Proprietor of MS DK TRADES Hanif Khan — 34/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170000722026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
51/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Superintendent Anti Evasion
Adv. PISAL PRAVIN PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
Danish Khan Proprietor of MS DK TRADES Hanif Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Order | |
| 17-03-2026 | Order | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel rejected the CGST department's application to cancel the bail of Danish Khan, accused in a GST fraud case involving ₹4.70 crore in fraudulent input tax credits. The court held that bail cannot be cancelled mechanically and found no abuse of bail conditions, evidence tampering, or witness intimidation by the accused. Since the accused complied with bail terms and cooperated with investigation, the court deemed the grounds insufficient to justify cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel rejected the CGST department's application to cancel the bail of Danish Khan, accused in a GST fraud case involving ₹4.70 crore in fraudulent input tax credits. The court held that bail cannot be cancelled mechanically and found no abuse of bail conditions, evidence tampering, or witness intimidation by the accused. Since the accused complied with bail terms and cooperated with investigation, the court deemed the grounds insufficient to justify cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts