Shankarlal Agarwal vs Shailendra B Singh — 53/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG160003032022
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
66/2022
Filing Date
05-12-2022
Registration No
53/2022
Registration Date
05-12-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shankarlal Agarwal
Adv. Suraj Rupwarte
Manju Agarwal
Mayank Agarwal
Respondent(s)
Shailendra B Singh
Darshana Kumuchandra Bodiwala
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Issues
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 30-01-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Shankarlal & Ors. vs Shailendra & Anr. (R.C.S. No. 53/2022) Outcome: The ad-interim application for temporary injunction is allowed. Defendant No. 1 is restrained by way of ad interim injunction from obstructing the plaintiffs' lawful easement right of way to access the suit property via the disputed road until the hearing of the full application. The court found prima facie that the plaintiffs have a right to use the road for property access and need protection against the defendant's obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Shankarlal & Ors. vs Shailendra & Anr. (R.C.S. No. 53/2022) Outcome: The ad-interim application for temporary injunction is allowed. Defendant No. 1 is restrained by way of ad interim injunction from obstructing the plaintiffs' lawful easement right of way to access the suit property via the disputed road until the hearing of the full application. The court found prima facie that the plaintiffs have a right to use the road for property access and need protection against the defendant's obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts