Deepak Dattatrey Deshmukh vs Vishwas Dattatrey Deshmukh Advocate - Patil M.D. — 1700028/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG160001792015
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1700037/2015
Filing Date
01-08-2015
Registration No
1700028/2015
Registration Date
01-08-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Deepak Dattatrey Deshmukh
Adv. BHIDE ARUN RAMCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Vishwas Dattatrey Deshmukh Advocate - Patil M.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 12-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 02-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 22-12-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 08-12-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In R.C.S. no. 28/2015 (Deepak vs Vishwas), the Civil Judge, J.D. Pali allowed the plaintiff's application to add proposed family members as parties to the case. The court held that the addition of these parties was essential for deciding the matter on merit, as the case was at the preliminary evidence stage and their presence would be necessary for full resolution. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In R.C.S. no. 28/2015 (Deepak vs Vishwas), the Civil Judge, J.D. Pali allowed the plaintiff's application to add proposed family members as parties to the case. The court held that the addition of these parties was essential for deciding the matter on merit, as the case was at the preliminary evidence stage and their presence would be necessary for full resolution. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts