Pramod Baban Thombare vs Renuka Ramesh Salvi Advocate - Tekale Rajesh — 71/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG160001582022
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
118/2022
Filing Date
07-07-2022
Registration No
71/2022
Registration Date
07-07-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pramod Baban Thombare
Adv. Sachin Sudhir Karkhanis
Respondent(s)
Renuka Ramesh Salvi Advocate - Tekale Rajesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 13-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 30-01-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The accused's application for permanent exemption from personal appearance under Sections 205 and 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been rejected. The court found that the accused failed to file a proper undertaking as required under precedent, and her continuous absence since the application was filed in August 2023—coupled with her failure to apply for bail—would delay the trial. The court ruled that the accused's presence is necessary for the summons case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The accused's application for permanent exemption from personal appearance under Sections 205 and 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been rejected. The court found that the accused failed to file a proper undertaking as required under precedent, and her continuous absence since the application was filed in August 2023—coupled with her failure to apply for bail—would delay the trial. The court ruled that the accused's presence is necessary for the summons case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts