Shri. Parshuram Shiva Thombare and 14 vs Shri. Waman Devaji Thombre Advocate - Kunte R. M. — 20/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG160001462016
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2016
Filing Date
11-07-2016
Registration No
20/2016
Registration Date
11-07-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Parshuram Shiva Thombare and 14
Adv. Joshi S. N.
smt. Nanda @ Shashikala Shahaji Thombre
Shri. Satish Shahaji Thombre
Smt. Sharmila Shahaji Thombre
Shalini Shahaji Thombre
Shri. Datta Shiva Thombre
Smt. Changuna Shiva Thombre
Smt. Asha @ Savita Suresh Khandagale
Shri. Santosh Rama Dhondge
Shri. Kashinath Rama Dhondage
Shri. Narayan Rama Dhondge
Smt. Anjali Haribhau Bhoir
Smt. Jyashree Gopal Langi
Shri. Tanaji Shiva Thombre
Smt. Jayashree Sitaram Khandagle
Respondent(s)
Shri. Waman Devaji Thombre Advocate - Kunte R. M.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 30-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-02-2026 | Issues | |
| 27-01-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Prakash Vs. Vishwas (R.C.S. No. 20/2016) Outcome: The defendant's application challenging the court's jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that it has inherent jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit, finding that allegations of fraud and forgery in obtaining the Tenancy Certificate fall outside the exclusive jurisdiction of the Revenue Authority under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948. The case will proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prakash Vs. Vishwas (R.C.S. No. 20/2016) Outcome: The defendant's application challenging the court's jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that it has inherent jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit, finding that allegations of fraud and forgery in obtaining the Tenancy Certificate fall outside the exclusive jurisdiction of the Revenue Authority under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948. The case will proceed on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts