Archana Harichandra Patekar vs Vikas Sureshkumar Bhageriya Advocate - Adv. Shaha Sanjaykumar Chandulal — 18/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG160001122023
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
24/2023
Filing Date
06-06-2023
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
06-06-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Archana Harichandra Patekar
Adv. Sujay Tukaram Kumbhar
Respondent(s)
Vikas Sureshkumar Bhageriya Advocate - Adv. Shaha Sanjaykumar Chandulal
Ananta Bhiku Kadam
Sushila Damodar Patekar
Shakuntala Pandhurang Kadam
Sanjana Namdev Aarde
Shweta Ganpat Jodh
Pravin Pandhurang Kadam
Harshad Ananta Kadam
Devendra Ananta kadam
Manjula Damodar Patekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Evidence
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 14-01-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 13-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 15-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff Archana Patekar's application for temporary injunction against defendants seeking to restrain them from alienating or interfering with her possession of ancestral land in Raigad district. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as documentary evidence (7/12 extracts and mutation entry No.589) showed the property has been in the defendants' names since 1987, and the plaintiff had not challenged these records for 36 years. The balance of convenience favored the defendants, who purchased the property for ₹36 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff Archana Patekar's application for temporary injunction against defendants seeking to restrain them from alienating or interfering with her possession of ancestral land in Raigad district. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as documentary evidence (7/12 extracts and mutation entry No.589) showed the property has been in the defendants' names since 1987, and the plaintiff had not challenged these records for 36 years. The balance of convenience favored the defendants, who purchased the property for ₹36 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts