Archana Harichandra Patekar vs Vikas Sureshkumar Bhageriya Advocate - Adv. Shaha Sanjaykumar Chandulal — 18/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG160001122023

Filing Number

24/2023

Filing Date

06-Jun-2023

Registration No

18/2023

Registration Date

06-Jun-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Pali

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Archana Harichandra Patekar

    Adv. Sujay Tukaram Kumbhar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Sureshkumar Bhageriya Advocate - Adv. Shaha Sanjaykumar Chandulal

  2. 2.Ananta Bhiku Kadam

  3. 3.Sushila Damodar Patekar

  4. 4.Shakuntala Pandhurang Kadam

  5. 5.Sanjana Namdev Aarde

  6. 6.Shweta Ganpat Jodh

  7. 7.Pravin Pandhurang Kadam

  8. 8.Harshad Ananta Kadam

  9. 9.Devendra Ananta kadam

  10. 10.Manjula Damodar Patekar

Case History

  1. 13-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  3. 21-Feb-2026

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  7. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  9. 14-Aug-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  10. 28-Jul-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  12. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  13. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  14. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  15. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  16. 13-Dec-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  17. 08-Nov-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  18. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  19. 26-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  20. 22-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  21. 27-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  22. 02-May-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff Archana Patekar's application for temporary injunction against defendants seeking to restrain them from alienating or interfering with her possession of ancestral land in Raigad district. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as documentary evidence (7/12 extracts and mutation entry No.589) showed the property has been in the defendants' names since 1987, and the plaintiff had not challenged these records for 36 years. The balance of convenience favored the defendants, who purchased the property for ₹36 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 02-May-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  24. 15-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  25. 04-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  26. 28-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  27. 03-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  28. 20-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  29. 30-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  30. 12-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  31. 02-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  32. 15-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  33. 08-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  34. 01-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  35. 28-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  36. 10-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  37. 03-Nov-2023

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  38. 27-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  39. 20-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  40. 25-Sep-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  41. 13-Sep-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  42. 28-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  43. 07-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  44. 15-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  45. 10-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  46. 19-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  47. 06-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 06-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff Archana Patekar's application for temporary injunction against defendants seeking to restrain them from alienating or interfering with her possession of ancestral land in Raigad district. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as documentary evidence (7/12 extracts and mutation entry No.589) showed the property has been in the defendants' names since 1987, and the plaintiff had not challenged these records for 36 years. The balance of convenience favored the defendants, who purchased the property for ₹36 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case