Sudhir Waman Karkhanis vs Vilas krishna Sutar Advocate - mali Vilas — 9/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG160001032021
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13/2021
Filing Date
23-04-2021
Registration No
9/2021
Registration Date
23-04-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhir Waman Karkhanis
Adv. Dharap D.D.
Respondent(s)
Vilas krishna Sutar Advocate - mali Vilas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 02-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 24-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 24-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC seeking dismissal of the eviction suit on grounds of res-judicata, lack of cause of action, insufficient pleading of landlord-tenant relationship, undervaluation, and limitation. The court found that the present suit (for eviction based on unauthorized construction) involves different fact-in-issue than the previous dismissed suit (which concerned rent default), and that res-judicata cannot be decided at the pleading stage without examining prior judgment documents. Consequently, the application was dismissed and the suit is allowed to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC seeking dismissal of the eviction suit on grounds of res-judicata, lack of cause of action, insufficient pleading of landlord-tenant relationship, undervaluation, and limitation. The court found that the present suit (for eviction based on unauthorized construction) involves different fact-in-issue than the previous dismissed suit (which concerned rent default), and that res-judicata cannot be decided at the pleading stage without examining prior judgment documents. Consequently, the application was dismissed and the suit is allowed to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts