STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through pali police station vs Baban Vithu Sutak Advocate - AKSHARA MILIND DESHMUKH — 33/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG160000612025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2024
Filing Number
51/2025
Filing Date
11-03-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
11-03-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
125
Police Station
Pali Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through pali police station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Baban Vithu Sutak Advocate - AKSHARA MILIND DESHMUKH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Baburao Vitthu Sutak, of charges under Section 65-E of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite seizing 5 liters of homemade liquor. The court noted significant inconsistencies and contradictions in the police witnesses' testimonies regarding timing, site conditions, and evidence handling, which created sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under Criminal Procedure Code Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Baburao Vitthu Sutak, of charges under Section 65-E of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite seizing 5 liters of homemade liquor. The court noted significant inconsistencies and contradictions in the police witnesses' testimonies regarding timing, site conditions, and evidence handling, which created sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under Criminal Procedure Code Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts