Shree. Baliram Barku Indulkar vs Shri. Kashiram Chandar Pawar and other Advocate - PATIL SUBHASH GOPINATH — 10/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG160000562017
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2017
Filing Date
05-04-2017
Registration No
10/2017
Registration Date
05-04-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shree. Baliram Barku Indulkar
Adv. SHEWAL NITIN MORESHWAR
Respondent(s)
Shri. Kashiram Chandar Pawar and other Advocate - PATIL SUBHASH GOPINATH
Shri. Anant Chandar Pawar
Shri. Satyajit Nitin Gawand
Grup Grampanchayat Jambhulpada
Amitkumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: This is a civil property dispute (Regular Civil Suit No. 10/2017) decided by the District Court, Palghar on 11 December 2023. The court disposed of the plaintiff's petition under Rule 29 by directing the plaintiff to make the corrections requested and resubmit the rectified suit statement within the next date of hearing or thereafter. The court found that the corrections sought are essential for proper adjudication and would not prejudice either party's case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: This is a civil property dispute (Regular Civil Suit No. 10/2017) decided by the District Court, Palghar on 11 December 2023. The court disposed of the plaintiff's petition under Rule 29 by directing the plaintiff to make the corrections requested and resubmit the rectified suit statement within the next date of hearing or thereafter. The court found that the corrections sought are essential for proper adjudication and would not prejudice either party's case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts