STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through pali police station vs Pradip Sitaaram Shinde Advocate - Uphale dinesh ramesh — 11/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 85(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG160000492026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
87
Police Station
Pali Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through pali police station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Pradip Sitaaram Shinde Advocate - Uphale dinesh ramesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Disposed
Hearing
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-02-2026 | Charge |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found that a criminal case was wrongly registered as an RCC (Recurrable Criminal Case) and ordered it to be re-registered as a Summons Criminal Case based on the lower punishment thresholds prescribed for the charged offenses under Section 324(4) BNS (maximum two years) and Section 85(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (maximum six months). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found that a criminal case was wrongly registered as an RCC (Recurrable Criminal Case) and ordered it to be re-registered as a Summons Criminal Case based on the lower punishment thresholds prescribed for the charged offenses under Section 324(4) BNS (maximum two years) and Section 85(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (maximum six months). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts