STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through pali police station vs Pradip Sitaaram Shinde Advocate - Uphale dinesh ramesh — 11/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 85(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG160000492026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Pali

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

87

Police Station

Pali Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 85(1)(b)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 324(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through pali police station

    Adv. Government pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Sitaaram Shinde Advocate - Uphale dinesh ramesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court found that a criminal case was wrongly registered as an RCC (Recurrable Criminal Case) and ordered it to be re-registered as a Summons Criminal Case based on the lower punishment thresholds prescribed for the charged offenses under Section 324(4) BNS (maximum two years) and Section 85(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (maximum six months). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found that a criminal case was wrongly registered as an RCC (Recurrable Criminal Case) and ordered it to be re-registered as a Summons Criminal Case based on the lower punishment thresholds prescribed for the charged offenses under Section 324(4) BNS (maximum two years) and Section 85(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (maximum six months). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case