STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through Pali Police Station vs Anil Mahadev Daki and 7 Advocate - SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR — 3/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,323,324,327,504,506,509,427. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG160000132021
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
13/2021
Filing Date
06-01-2021
Registration No
3/2021
Registration Date
06-01-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
FIR Details
FIR Number
85
Police Station
Pali Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through Pali Police Station
Adv. Government pleader V V Mhatre
Respondent(s)
Anil Mahadev Daki and 7 Advocate - SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Surendra Dattatray Patil
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Nitin Krushna Kedari
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Sandesh Laxmun Shinde
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Sujit Kishor Patil
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Ghansham Hiraji Thakur
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Mahadev Pandurang Bade
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Amar Baban Patil
Adv. SHEWALE NITIN MORESHWAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Anil Mahadev Daki & Ors (RCC 03/2021) Outcome: The court rejected the informant's application seeking additional charges under IPC sections 395 (dacoity), 354, and 354B (outraging modesty) against accused Anil Daki. The court found insufficient material on record to support the section 395 charge, noted that the informant's evidence had not yet been recorded, and observed that adding a session-court-triable offense could potentially harass the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Anil Mahadev Daki & Ors (RCC 03/2021) Outcome: The court rejected the informant's application seeking additional charges under IPC sections 395 (dacoity), 354, and 354B (outraging modesty) against accused Anil Daki. The court found insufficient material on record to support the section 395 charge, noted that the informant's evidence had not yet been recorded, and observed that adding a session-court-triable offense could potentially harass the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts