The State of Maharashtra th. P.S.Pali vs Ahamad Mahamad Umar Shaikh Advocate - AMBOLKAR SAMIR ANANT — 1/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG160000042020
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2020
Filing Date
07-01-2020
Registration No
1/2020
Registration Date
07-01-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pali
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
Pali Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra th. P.S.Pali
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Ahamad Mahamad Umar Shaikh Advocate - AMBOLKAR SAMIR ANANT
Abdul Kadir Mahamad Safir Khan
Adv. Shinde M.N.
Imtiyajali Bismillah Shaikh
Adv. Shinde M.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D And J.M.F.C Pali-Sudhgad
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 03-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 03-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: Accused Ahmed Mohammad Umar Shaikh and Abdul Kadir Mohammad Sakir Khan were acquitted of theft charges (IPC Sections 379 r/w 34) in a copper coil theft case from a transformer at Khurawale. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, specifically noting that evidence under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act was insufficiently corroborated by independent witnesses and the chain of evidence was incomplete. Their bail bonds stand cancelled, and trial continues for the absconded third accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Accused Ahmed Mohammad Umar Shaikh and Abdul Kadir Mohammad Sakir Khan were acquitted of theft charges (IPC Sections 379 r/w 34) in a copper coil theft case from a transformer at Khurawale. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, specifically noting that evidence under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act was insufficiently corroborated by independent witnesses and the chain of evidence was incomplete. Their bail bonds stand cancelled, and trial continues for the absconded third accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts