The State of Maharashtra Through Kolad P.S. vs Vijay Ramesh Shetti @ Lakshmikant Revansiddhappa Kalashetti Advocate - Shet Prasad Ashok — 57/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150006732023
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
366/2023
Filing Date
15-11-2023
Registration No
57/2023
Registration Date
15-11-2023
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
83
Police Station
Kolad Police Stn.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Kolad P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vijay Ramesh Shetti @ Lakshmikant Revansiddhappa Kalashetti Advocate - Shet Prasad Ashok
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of accused Vijay Ramesh Shetti in Special Case No.57/2023 has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused for the serious offence of murder under IPC Section 302, along with charges under the Arms Act and SC/ST Atrocities Act, including recovery of a pistol with supporting chemical analysis. The court determined that despite the accused's serious health condition (HIV) and lengthy custody since September 2023, the gravity of the offence, risk of witness intimidation, and possibility of committing similar offences warranted denial of bail, and directed expedited hearing of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of accused Vijay Ramesh Shetti in Special Case No.57/2023 has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused for the serious offence of murder under IPC Section 302, along with charges under the Arms Act and SC/ST Atrocities Act, including recovery of a pistol with supporting chemical analysis. The court determined that despite the accused's serious health condition (HIV) and lengthy custody since September 2023, the gravity of the offence, risk of witness intimidation, and possibility of committing similar offences warranted denial of bail, and directed expedited hearing of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts