The State Through Pali Police Station vs Sadanand Kashinath Kadam Advocate - Musale Pravil Govind — 64/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG150006042022
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
312/2022
Filing Date
29-09-2022
Registration No
64/2022
Registration Date
29-09-2022
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
Pali Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Pali Police Station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sadanand Kashinath Kadam Advocate - Musale Pravil Govind
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 24-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
This is not a court order with a substantive ruling. It is a deposition transcript of Witness No. 9 (Police Head Constable Dharmendra Kashinath Mhatre) in Sessions Case No. 64/2022, recorded on 02.02.2026. The witness testified about photographs taken during a spot panchanama on 23.06.2022 and the issuance of a Section 65-B certificate; cross-examination by the accused's counsel highlighted discrepancies including the certificate lacking an issuance date and missing supporting documentation for the witness's technical qualifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is not a court order with a substantive ruling. It is a deposition transcript of Witness No. 9 (Police Head Constable Dharmendra Kashinath Mhatre) in Sessions Case No. 64/2022, recorded on 02.02.2026. The witness testified about photographs taken during a spot panchanama on 23.06.2022 and the issuance of a Section 65-B certificate; cross-examination by the accused's counsel highlighted discrepancies including the certificate lacking an issuance date and missing supporting documentation for the witness's technical qualifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts