The State of Maharashtra Through Mangaon PSCR 175-2024 vs Sharad Tukaram More Advocate - Shet Prasad Ashok — 47/2024
Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,5m,6,10. Status: Formal Hearing. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150005842024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-09-2024
Filing Number
249/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
47/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
175
Police Station
Mangaon Police Stn.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Mangaon PSCR 175-2024
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sharad Tukaram More Advocate - Shet Prasad Ashok
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 06-05-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 22-04-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 08-04-2026 | List of Witness |
| 25-03-2026 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - 47/2024 This is a second bail application by accused Sharad Tukaram More (age 18) in Sessions Case No. 47/2024 before the Court of Session Judge, Raigad at Mangaon. The accused filed a regular bail application under Section 480 B.N.S.S. and Sections 64(1), 64(2)(c), 62(2) B.N.S., and Sections 4, 5(M), 6 & 10 of POCSO after his first bail application was rejected. The prosecution filed a C.A. Report in response. The court order document does not contain the final judgment/order on the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 47/2024 This is a second bail application by accused Sharad Tukaram More (age 18) in Sessions Case No. 47/2024 before the Court of Session Judge, Raigad at Mangaon. The accused filed a regular bail application under Section 480 B.N.S.S. and Sections 64(1), 64(2)(c), 62(2) B.N.S., and Sections 4, 5(M), 6 & 10 of POCSO after his first bail application was rejected. The prosecution filed a C.A. Report in response. The court order document does not contain the final judgment/order on the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts