To State vs Rajendra Dattatrey Vaghmare And 3 Advocate - Dighe Swapnil — 49/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2), (J), (N), 34. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150005742021
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
224/2021
Filing Date
02-09-2021
Registration No
49/2021
Registration Date
02-09-2021
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
To State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Dattatrey Vaghmare And 3 Advocate - Dighe Swapnil
Asha Rajendra Vaghmare
Lahu Barkya Pawar
Sangita Lahu Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 29-01-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 18-12-2025 | Notice Ready |
| 30-10-2025 | Notice Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Case No. 49/2021 Outcome: Bail Granted Four accused persons (parents of a 13-year-old girl and parents of a 17-year-old boy) charged with child sexual abuse, rape, and child marriage were granted bail on September 30, 2021. The court found the case fit for bail considering the accused had no criminal records, were local residents, the victim's age documentation was unclear, and there was an alleged consensual relationship between the minors. Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and comply with conditions including not pressurizing witnesses, remaining within court jurisdiction, and maintaining contact via mobile phones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Case No. 49/2021 Outcome: Bail Granted Four accused persons (parents of a 13-year-old girl and parents of a 17-year-old boy) charged with child sexual abuse, rape, and child marriage were granted bail on September 30, 2021. The court found the case fit for bail considering the accused had no criminal records, were local residents, the victim's age documentation was unclear, and there was an alleged consensual relationship between the minors. Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and comply with conditions including not pressurizing witnesses, remaining within court jurisdiction, and maintaining contact via mobile phones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts