The State of Maharashtra through Mahad City PSCR 35-2025 vs Omkar Rajanikant Ranadive Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe — 32/2025
Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 7,8,11(i),12,9m,10. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150003902025
e-Filing Number
30-05-2025
Filing Number
163/2025
Filing Date
02-Jun-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
02-Jun-2025
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Mahad City Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra through Mahad City PSCR 35-2025
Respondent(s)
-
1.Omkar Rajanikant Ranadive Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State Vs. Omkar Rajnikant Randive (Spl. POCSO Case No.32/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court allowed the accused's regular bail application despite serious POCSO charges involving alleged sexual offenses against two child victims. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with strict conditions including: prohibition from entering Mahad Taluka jurisdiction until trial conclusion, no contact with victims or witnesses, regular court attendance, and non-commission of similar offenses. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception" and held that pre-trial incarceration cannot serve as punishment before conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Compliance
District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
-
07-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
-
06-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
-
30-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
-
16-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
-
09-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
-
16-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
02-Feb-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
27-Jan-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
12-Jan-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
22-Dec-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
09-Dec-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
29-Nov-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
15-Nov-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
01-Nov-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
08-Oct-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
25-Sep-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
11-Sep-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
28-Aug-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
04-Aug-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
15-Jul-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
01-Jul-2025
Supply of Copies
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
16-Jun-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
02-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2025
Case Summary: State Vs. Omkar Rajnikant Randive (Spl. POCSO Case No.32/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court allowed the accused's regular bail application despite serious POCSO charges involving alleged sexual offenses against two child victims. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with strict conditions including: prohibition from entering Mahad Taluka jurisdiction until trial conclusion, no contact with victims or witnesses, regular court attendance, and non-commission of similar offenses. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception" and held that pre-trial incarceration cannot serve as punishment before conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts