The State of Maharashtra through Mahad City PSCR 35-2025 vs Omkar Rajanikant Ranadive Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe — 32/2025
Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 7,8,11(i),12,9m,10. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150003902025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
30-05-2025
Filing Number
163/2025
Filing Date
02-06-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
02-06-2025
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Mahad City Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Mahad City PSCR 35-2025
Respondent(s)
Omkar Rajanikant Ranadive Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Compliance
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Compliance | |
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 06-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 30-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 16-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State Vs. Omkar Rajnikant Randive (Spl. POCSO Case No.32/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court allowed the accused's regular bail application despite serious POCSO charges involving alleged sexual offenses against two child victims. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with strict conditions including: prohibition from entering Mahad Taluka jurisdiction until trial conclusion, no contact with victims or witnesses, regular court attendance, and non-commission of similar offenses. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception" and held that pre-trial incarceration cannot serve as punishment before conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State Vs. Omkar Rajnikant Randive (Spl. POCSO Case No.32/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court allowed the accused's regular bail application despite serious POCSO charges involving alleged sexual offenses against two child victims. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with strict conditions including: prohibition from entering Mahad Taluka jurisdiction until trial conclusion, no contact with victims or witnesses, regular court attendance, and non-commission of similar offenses. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception" and held that pre-trial incarceration cannot serve as punishment before conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts