The State of Maharashtra through Mahad City PSCR 35-2025 vs Omkar Rajanikant Ranadive Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe — 32/2025

Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 7,8,11(i),12,9m,10. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHRG150003902025

Compliance

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

30-05-2025

Filing Number

163/2025

Filing Date

02-06-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

02-06-2025

Court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon

Judge

1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Mahad City Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 7,8,11(i),12,9m,10

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra through Mahad City PSCR 35-2025

Respondent(s)

Omkar Rajanikant Ranadive Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon

09-04-2026

Compliance

07-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

06-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

30-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

16-03-2026

Charge

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State Vs. Omkar Rajnikant Randive (Spl. POCSO Case No.32/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court allowed the accused's regular bail application despite serious POCSO charges involving alleged sexual offenses against two child victims. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with strict conditions including: prohibition from entering Mahad Taluka jurisdiction until trial conclusion, no contact with victims or witnesses, regular court attendance, and non-commission of similar offenses. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception" and held that pre-trial incarceration cannot serve as punishment before conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State Vs. Omkar Rajnikant Randive (Spl. POCSO Case No.32/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court allowed the accused's regular bail application despite serious POCSO charges involving alleged sexual offenses against two child victims. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with strict conditions including: prohibition from entering Mahad Taluka jurisdiction until trial conclusion, no contact with victims or witnesses, regular court attendance, and non-commission of similar offenses. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception" and held that pre-trial incarceration cannot serve as punishment before conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case