Ramesh Shankar Khandagale vs Baliram Padmakar Koli — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG150003432025
e-Filing Number
29-04-2025
Filing Number
212/2025
Filing Date
29-04-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
29-04-2025
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Shankar Khandagale
Adv. OKA RAHUL PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
Baliram Padmakar Koli
Gurunath Padmakar Koli
Vishal Krushna Koli
Laxman Shalik Mhatre
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judge allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of a 4 months 18 days delay in filing a miscellaneous civil appeal, finding that personal hardships—including the applicant's old age and sickness, his brother's terminal cancer, and his advocate's mother's illness and death—constituted sufficient cause. The court imposed Rs. 1,000 costs on the applicant as compensation to the respondents and permitted registration of the appeal after cost payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Judge allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of a 4 months 18 days delay in filing a miscellaneous civil appeal, finding that personal hardships—including the applicant's old age and sickness, his brother's terminal cancer, and his advocate's mother's illness and death—constituted sufficient cause. The court imposed Rs. 1,000 costs on the applicant as compensation to the respondents and permitted registration of the appeal after cost payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts