The State of Maharashtra Through Dighi Sagari PSCR 17-2024 vs Sufiyan Abdul Mannan Khan and 1 oths. Advocate - Vadhavkar A.B. — 30/2024
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(b)ii(c),29,. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150003402024
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/2024
Filing Date
14-06-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
14-06-2024
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
Dighi Sagri Police Station Tal.Shriwardhan.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Dighi Sagari PSCR 17-2024
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sufiyan Abdul Mannan Khan and 1 oths. Advocate - Vadhavkar A.B.
Abdulla Munir Faizee
Adv. Pravin Tekale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Notice Ready | |
| 17-04-2026 | Notice Ready | |
| 04-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 23-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 12-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail Denied – The court rejected the bail application of Sufiyan Abdul Mannan Khan in NDPS Case No.30/2024. The accused was arrested with over 2 kg of charas (commercial quantity), triggering the mandatory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which the court found he failed to satisfy. The court determined there were no reasonable grounds to believe the accused was innocent or unlikely to commit further offenses, and rejected arguments based on health grounds and parity with a co-accused who had no drugs in possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail Denied – The court rejected the bail application of Sufiyan Abdul Mannan Khan in NDPS Case No.30/2024. The accused was arrested with over 2 kg of charas (commercial quantity), triggering the mandatory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which the court found he failed to satisfy. The court determined there were no reasonable grounds to believe the accused was innocent or unlikely to commit further offenses, and rejected arguments based on health grounds and parity with a co-accused who had no drugs in possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts