The State of Maharashtra thourgh Roha Police station CR No.22-2025 vs Shramit Ganesh Salavi Advocate - Shinde M.N. — 19/2025
Case under Information Technology Act Section 66(E),67,67B. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150002692025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
28-03-2025
Filing Number
96/2025
Filing Date
29-03-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
29-03-2025
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Roha Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra thourgh Roha Police station CR No.22-2025
Respondent(s)
Shramit Ganesh Salavi Advocate - Shinde M.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Compliance | |
| 10-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 19-01-2026 | Compliance | |
| 25-11-2025 | Compliance | |
| 11-11-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary Bail Granted. The court allowed the bail application of accused Shramit Ganesh Salvi, charged under BNS sections 75(2), 78(2), POCSO Act sections 11, 12, and IT Act sections 66(e), 67(b), releasing him on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety. The court imposed stringent conditions including a 50 km radius restriction from the survivor's village, prohibition on witness tampering, and a ban on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Bail Granted. The court allowed the bail application of accused Shramit Ganesh Salvi, charged under BNS sections 75(2), 78(2), POCSO Act sections 11, 12, and IT Act sections 66(e), 67(b), releasing him on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety. The court imposed stringent conditions including a 50 km radius restriction from the survivor's village, prohibition on witness tampering, and a ban on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts