The State of Maharashtra through Pali Police Station CR No.5-2025 vs Aparna urf Dipti Dinesh Shewale — 17/2025

Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(1)(za)(A),3(2)(va). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHRG150002452025

Charge

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2025

Filing Number

77/2025

Filing Date

18-03-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

18-03-2025

Court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon

Judge

2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

Pali Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(1)(za)(A),3(2)(va)
IA/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section Aparna urf Dipti Dinesh ShewaleThe State of Maharashtra through Pali Police Station CR No.5-2025

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra through Pali Police Station CR No.5-2025

Respondent(s)

Aparna urf Dipti Dinesh Shewale

Sudhir Vithal Shewale

Manisha urf Supriya Sudhir Shewale

Yogita Dhanesh Shewale

Manda urf Bhagyashri Bhalchandra Shewale

Dinesh Raghunath Shewale

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon

27-04-2026

Charge

12-03-2026

Charge

02-01-2026

Charge

20-12-2025

B.W._Ready

17-12-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Interim Orders

02-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Aparna urf Dipti Dinesh Shewale & Others (Case 17/2025) Interim bail was granted to the accused. The court found that custodial interrogation was not necessary and directed the accused be released on bail on usual conditions. No informant report to the bail was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Aparna urf Dipti Dinesh Shewale & Others (Case 17/2025) Interim bail was granted to the accused. The court found that custodial interrogation was not necessary and directed the accused be released on bail on usual conditions. No informant report to the bail was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case