The state through Mahad MIDC Police station vs Ashok Digambar Rathod Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe — 18/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 377,. Status: Formal Hearing. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150002442024
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
123/2024
Filing Date
02-05-2024
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
02-05-2024
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Mahad M.I.D.C. Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The state through Mahad MIDC Police station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Ashok Digambar Rathod Advocate - Swapnil M. Dighe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Formal Hearing
List of Witness
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Formal Hearing | |
| 08-04-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 24-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for supply of CCTV footage was partly allowed. The court permitted the accused and his advocate to view the sensitive CCTV footage on court premises under controlled conditions in the presence of court staff, and to take notes of relevant facts. However, no physical copy of the footage will be supplied, and the accused is strictly prohibited from recording, copying, photographing, or reproducing the video in any manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for supply of CCTV footage was partly allowed. The court permitted the accused and his advocate to view the sensitive CCTV footage on court premises under controlled conditions in the presence of court staff, and to take notes of relevant facts. However, no physical copy of the footage will be supplied, and the accused is strictly prohibited from recording, copying, photographing, or reproducing the video in any manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts