Baban laxman Kamble vs State Of Maharashtra Through Mhasala Police Station Cr. No. 31/2026 — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG150001482026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Mhasala Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baban laxman Kamble
Adv. SHINDE SANSKRUTI SANKET
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra Through Mhasala Police Station Cr. No. 31/2026
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to Baban Laxman Kamble, accused of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 4,000 under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The judge found that further detention was unnecessary since investigation was largely complete, the accused had no criminal record, and was a government employee. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 40,000 with surety, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, regular reporting to the Anti-Corruption Bureau, and prohibition from leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2026
The court granted bail to Baban Laxman Kamble, accused of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 4,000 under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The judge found that further detention was unnecessary since investigation was largely complete, the accused had no criminal record, and was a government employee. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 40,000 with surety, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, regular reporting to the Anti-Corruption Bureau, and prohibition from leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts