Rushikesh Balasaheb Jodh vs The State of Maharashtra Through Dighi Sagari Police Station Cr. No. 4/2026 — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 20th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG150001412026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

78/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon

Judge

2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

Dighi Sagri Police Station Tal.Shriwardhan.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 105,125(B),281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184,185

Petitioner(s)

Rushikesh Balasaheb Jodh

Adv. WAGHMARE RAJESH CHANDU

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Dighi Sagari Police Station Cr. No. 4/2026

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon

20-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Rushikesh Balasaheb Jodh, accused of causing a fatal accident by driving a car while intoxicated. The judge found prima facie strong evidence against the accused—including high blood alcohol levels, CCTV footage, and resulting deaths—and concluded that releasing him would be unjust and risk witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Rushikesh Balasaheb Jodh, accused of causing a fatal accident by driving a car while intoxicated. The judge found prima facie strong evidence against the accused—including high blood alcohol levels, CCTV footage, and resulting deaths—and concluded that releasing him would be unjust and risk witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case