The State Of Maharashtra Through Mahad MIDC Police Station Cr. No. 79/2025 vs Macchindra Tukaram Bhosale And Other — 5/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 238, 3(5). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150000482026
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
Mahad M.I.D.C. Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through Mahad MIDC Police Station Cr. No. 79/2025
Respondent(s)
Macchindra Tukaram Bhosale And Other
Sushant Santosh Patil
Shubham Sadashiv Sutar
Rohan Prabhakar Gavans
Siddique Feroze Khan
Ali Hoosein Fakarukhan Pathana
Birju Jayendra Shukla
Kamlesh Alias Kartik Sadram
Mangilal Ramakisan Bishnoi
Prabhakar Chandrauji Gavans
Siba Ruhiya Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 26-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 22-04-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case 5/2026 Summary: The application filed by Accused No. 5, Siddik Firoz Khan, for release on cash surety was allowed. The court granted his release on a temporary cash surety of Rs. 50,000 for fifteen days, finding that denying bail benefits due to inability to furnish surety while incarcerated would defeat the purpose of bail. The accused must furnish regular bail surety within the stipulated period and comply with all conditions of the earlier bail order dated 08.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 5/2026 Summary: The application filed by Accused No. 5, Siddik Firoz Khan, for release on cash surety was allowed. The court granted his release on a temporary cash surety of Rs. 50,000 for fifteen days, finding that denying bail benefits due to inability to furnish surety while incarcerated would defeat the purpose of bail. The accused must furnish regular bail surety within the stipulated period and comply with all conditions of the earlier bail order dated 08.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts