Kokanratna Food Services through Prop. Mr. Amol Ramdas Nimbalkar vs Amar Nursery through Prop. Mr. Ashok Purushottam Kalyankar and 1 oths. Advocate - Mehta S. S. — 1/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHRG150000132023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2023
Filing Date
06-01-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
06-01-2023
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kokanratna Food Services through Prop. Mr. Amol Ramdas Nimbalkar
Adv. Kamble Sushil Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
Amar Nursery through Prop. Mr. Ashok Purushottam Kalyankar and 1 oths. Advocate - Mehta S. S.
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 09-04-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 24-03-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 24-02-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary Bail Granted. The Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon allowed the bail application of appellant Amol Ramdas Nimbalkar in Criminal Appeal No.1/2023 (Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case). The appellant was released on personal bond of Rs.25,000 with a surety of equal amount, on condition that he pay the remaining Rs.25,000 as undertaken, after serving approximately 6 months in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Bail Granted. The Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon allowed the bail application of appellant Amol Ramdas Nimbalkar in Criminal Appeal No.1/2023 (Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case). The appellant was released on personal bond of Rs.25,000 with a surety of equal amount, on condition that he pay the remaining Rs.25,000 as undertaken, after serving approximately 6 months in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts