The State vs Rakesh Umaji Shirke Advocate - Swapnil Dighe — 1/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2)(l),376(2)(j),376(3),363. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG150000012022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
01-01-2022
Filing Number
1/2022
Filing Date
01-01-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
01-01-2022
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
Roha Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Umaji Shirke Advocate - Swapnil Dighe
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1 and Addl. Session Judge Mangaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC by the accused, charged with rape and sexual assault on a 5-year-old child under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(j), 376(3), 363 and POCSO Act sections, was rejected. The court found credible evidence including medical reports showing the victim's ruptured hymen and blood stains, and concluded that releasing the accused posed risks of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, especially since the victim and informant are from another state and trial has already commenced with expected completion within 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC by the accused, charged with rape and sexual assault on a 5-year-old child under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(j), 376(3), 363 and POCSO Act sections, was rejected. The court found credible evidence including medical reports showing the victim's ruptured hymen and blood stains, and concluded that releasing the accused posed risks of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, especially since the victim and informant are from another state and trial has already commenced with expected completion within 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts